head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs BugPin
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BugPin has 48 stars, 16 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 194,046% (93,190 vs 48 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; BugPin is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, BugPin 33%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | BugPin | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 48 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 16 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick BugPin if
- You want the BugPin feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and BugPin fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About BugPin
The self hosted, open source visual bug reporting tool. Capture screenshots, annotate issues, and track bugs from your web applications. Admin Console Manage projects and triage reports. Light and dark mode out of the box. Light Mode Dark Mode Widget Capture screenshots and annotate issues from any page on your site. Embeds with a single script tag. Works with React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, or vanilla JS Shadow DOM isolation: widget styles never leak into your site, and your CSS never bleeds into the widget Offline safe: reports are cached locally and synced when the connection returns Annotation tools: pen…
read the full BugPin overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or BugPin more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and BugPin has 48. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and BugPin free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and BugPin under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and BugPin?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and BugPin in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or BugPin?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose BugPin if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.