head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs agentscope-studio
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agentscope-studio has 664 stars, 147 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 13,935% (93,190 vs 664 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; agentscope-studio is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, agentscope-studio 22%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | agentscope-studio | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 664 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 147 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agentscope-studio if
- You want the agentscope-studio feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and agentscope-studio fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About agentscope-studio
[!IMPORTANT] Archive Notice AgentScope 2.0 now ships a built in Web UI as part of its batteries included Agent Service — a FastAPI backend paired with a pre built frontend ( examples/web ui ) for building, running and observing agents out of the box. Powered by a unified event stream, it visualizes agent reasoning, tool calls and multimodal content in real time, and offers multi session isolation, Agent Team (leader–worker) orchestration with task planning, permission & human in the loop control, IM channels (Feishu / Discord), MCP & Skill Hub management, session persistence and task scheduling. With these…
read the full agentscope-studio overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or agentscope-studio more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and agentscope-studio has 664. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and agentscope-studio free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and agentscope-studio under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and agentscope-studio?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and agentscope-studio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or agentscope-studio?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agentscope-studio if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.