head to head · open source

tabler vs openharness

tabler has 41,728 GitHub stars, 4,427 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. openharness has 529 stars, 50 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tabler leads on adoption by 7,788% (41,728 vs 529 stars). tabler is written in Astro under MIT; openharness is written in C under MIT. tabler has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, openharness 9%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

tabler ★ 42K openharness ★ 529 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

tabler openharness
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 529
License MIT MIT
Written in Astro C
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick tabler if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Astro
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full tabler profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About tabler

Tabler is a free and open source HTML dashboard UI kit built on Bootstrap 5, aimed at developers and teams that need ready made layouts, components and demo pages for admin panels, dashboards and web apps.

read the full tabler overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

tabler vs ant-design tabler vs open-design tabler vs manim tabler vs anime tabler vs hyperframes tabler vs daisyui tabler vs motion tabler vs layui tabler vs lottie-ios tabler vs vant tabler vs primitives tabler vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is tabler or openharness more popular?

tabler has 41,728 GitHub stars and openharness has 529. tabler has the larger community by that measure.

Are tabler and openharness free?

Both are open source. tabler is licensed under MIT and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between tabler and openharness?

tabler is written in Astro and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, tabler or openharness?

Choose tabler if you want the larger community (41,728 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.