head to head · open source

Plasmic vs zag

Plasmic has 7,053 GitHub stars, 727 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zag has 5,220 stars, 291 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plasmic leads on adoption by 35% (7,053 vs 5,220 stars). Plasmic is written in TypeScript under MIT; zag is written in TypeScript under MIT. Plasmic has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, zag 6%. Plasmic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (design-systems, headless), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Plasmic ★ 7.1K zag ★ 5.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Plasmic zag
GitHub stars ★ 7.1K ★ 5.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 727 ⑂ 291
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Plasmic if

  • You weight community size — 7.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Plasmic profile →

pick zag if

  • You want the zag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and zag fits your workflow better

full zag profile →

About Plasmic

Plasmic is an open source, MIT licensed visual builder for React that integrates with an existing codebase, aimed at developers and at the marketing, design, and technical users who build alongside them.

read the full Plasmic overview →

About zag

Zag is an MIT licensed TypeScript library of framework agnostic, headless component state machines for building an accessible design system once and consuming it in React, Solid, Vue, Svelte or vanilla JavaScript.

read the full zag overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs plasmic ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

Plasmic vs ant-design Plasmic vs open-design Plasmic vs manim Plasmic vs anime Plasmic vs hyperframes Plasmic vs daisyui Plasmic vs tabler Plasmic vs motion Plasmic vs layui Plasmic vs lottie-ios Plasmic vs vant Plasmic vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is Plasmic or zag more popular?

Plasmic has 7,053 GitHub stars and zag has 5,220. Plasmic has the larger community by that measure.

Are Plasmic and zag free?

Both are open source. Plasmic is licensed under MIT and zag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Plasmic and zag?

Plasmic is written in TypeScript and zag in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Plasmic or zag?

Choose Plasmic if you want the larger community (7,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.