head to head · open source

ECC vs plandex

ECC has 271,121 GitHub stars, 40,511 forks, 336 open issues and last shipped yesterday. plandex has 15,687 stars, 1,178 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 1.0 years ago. ECC leads on adoption by 1,628% (271,121 vs 15,687 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; plandex is written in Go under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, plandex 8%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 271K plandex ★ 16K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC plandex
GitHub stars ★ 271K ★ 16K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-10-02 2025-10-03
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 271K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick plandex if

  • You want the plandex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and plandex fits your workflow better

full plandex profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About plandex

Plandex is an open source, terminal based AI coding agent for developers who need to plan and execute large coding tasks spanning dozens of files in real world projects.

read the full plandex overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or plandex more popular?

ECC has 271,121 GitHub stars and plandex has 15,687. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and plandex free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and plandex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and plandex?

ECC is written in JavaScript and plandex in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or plandex?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (271,121 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose plandex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.