head to head · open source

Passbolt vs PearPass

Passbolt has 6,127 GitHub stars, 400 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PearPass has 534 stars, 70 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Passbolt leads on adoption by 1,047% (6,127 vs 534 stars). Passbolt is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; PearPass is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Passbolt has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, PearPass 13%. Passbolt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Passbolt ★ 6.1K PearPass ★ 534 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Passbolt PearPass
GitHub stars ★ 6.1K ★ 534
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-14
Forks ⑂ 400 ⑂ 70
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Passbolt if

  • You weight community size — 6.1K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Passbolt profile →

pick PearPass if

  • You want the PearPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and PearPass fits your workflow better

full PearPass profile →

About Passbolt

Passbolt is a security first, open source password manager for teams, published here as the Passbolt Community Edition (CE) JSON API under the AGPL 3.0 licence and built for organizations that need to centralize, organize and share passwords and secrets on infrastructure they control.

read the full Passbolt overview →

About PearPass

PearPass is an open source, end to end encrypted password and identity manager for macOS, Linux, and Windows that keeps credentials encrypted on disk and syncs them directly between devices over Pear Runtime rather than through a central server.

read the full PearPass overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs passbolt keepassxc vs pearpass bitwarden vs passbolt keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs 2fas n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

Passbolt vs KeePassXC Passbolt vs Bitwarden Passbolt vs Aegis Authenticator Passbolt vs Padloc Passbolt vs 2FAS

Frequently asked questions

Is Passbolt or PearPass more popular?

Passbolt has 6,127 GitHub stars and PearPass has 534. Passbolt has the larger community by that measure.

Are Passbolt and PearPass free?

Both are open source. Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and PearPass has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Passbolt and PearPass?

Passbolt is written in PHP and PearPass in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Passbolt or PearPass?

Choose Passbolt if you want the larger community (6,127 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PearPass if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.