head to head · open source

vaultwarden vs 2FAS

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars, 3,228 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. 2FAS has 1,515 stars, 130 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 4,375% (67,795 vs 1,515 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; 2FAS is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, 2FAS 9%. 2FAS was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vaultwarden ★ 68K 2FAS ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

vaultwarden 2FAS
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vaultwarden if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vaultwarden profile →

pick 2FAS if

  • You want the 2FAS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and 2FAS fits your workflow better

full 2FAS profile →

About vaultwarden

Vaultwarden is an unofficial, Bitwarden compatible server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API written in Rust, aimed at self hosters who want to run their own vault backend for the official Bitwarden clients without the resource demands of the official service.

read the full vaultwarden overview →

About 2FAS

2FAS is an open source Android application for two factor authentication, and its listing describes it as a local first 2FA authenticator and password manager. The project lives in the password and secret management ecosystem, and the repository contains the source code for the 2FAS Auth Android app, written in Kotlin and licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0. The README presents 2FAS as an authentication method that adds a second factor, such as a one time password shown on a phone, alongside a username and password.

read the full 2FAS overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs 2fas keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs passbolt bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs pearpass bitwarden vs passbolt openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

vaultwarden vs KeePassXC vaultwarden vs Bitwarden vaultwarden vs Aegis Authenticator vaultwarden vs Passbolt vaultwarden vs Padloc vaultwarden vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is vaultwarden or 2FAS more popular?

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars and 2FAS has 1,515. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are vaultwarden and 2FAS free?

Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and 2FAS under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vaultwarden and 2FAS?

vaultwarden is written in Rust and 2FAS in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vaultwarden or 2FAS?

Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (67,795 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose 2FAS if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.