head to head · open source

n8n vs Lightpanda

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars, 60,739 forks, 1,143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lightpanda has 35,409 stars, 1,680 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. n8n leads on adoption by 479% (204,887 vs 35,409 stars). n8n is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0. n8n has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Lightpanda 5%. n8n was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

n8n ★ 205K Lightpanda ★ 35K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

n8n Lightpanda
GitHub stars ★ 205K ★ 35K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Zig
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 61K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick n8n if

  • You weight community size — 205K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full n8n profile →

pick Lightpanda if

  • You want the Lightpanda feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You evaluated both and Lightpanda fits your workflow better

full Lightpanda profile →

About n8n

n8n is a visual workflow automation platform built in TypeScript that combines a drag and drop editor with custom code execution. It lives in the integration and automation ecosystem, positioned as an open alternative to proprietary services like Zapier. Users design multi step workflows—called “n8n flows”—that connect apps, services, and custom logic to automate repetitive tasks.

read the full n8n overview →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap n8n vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit n8n vs organic-maps n8n vs osmand n8n vs comaps n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online n8n vs rustdesk excalidraw vs obs-studio

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

n8n vs Browser Use n8n vs frigate n8n vs ProxmoxVE n8n vs ActivePieces n8n vs Skyvern n8n vs Automa n8n vs LiveKit n8n vs amis n8n vs Windmill n8n vs Botpress n8n vs mitosis n8n vs Automatisch

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n or Lightpanda more popular?

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars and Lightpanda has 35,409. n8n has the larger community by that measure.

Are n8n and Lightpanda free?

Both are open source. n8n has no licence declared in this registry, and Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between n8n and Lightpanda?

n8n is written in TypeScript and Lightpanda in Zig. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, n8n or Lightpanda?

Choose n8n if you want the larger community (204,887 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Lightpanda if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.