head to head · open source

vaultwarden vs Passbolt

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars, 3,228 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Passbolt has 6,127 stars, 400 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 1,006% (67,795 vs 6,127 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; Passbolt is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Passbolt 7%. Passbolt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vaultwarden ★ 68K Passbolt ★ 6.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

vaultwarden Passbolt
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 6.1K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust PHP
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 400
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vaultwarden if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vaultwarden profile →

pick Passbolt if

  • You want the Passbolt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Passbolt fits your workflow better

full Passbolt profile →

About vaultwarden

Vaultwarden is an unofficial, Bitwarden compatible server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API written in Rust, aimed at self hosters who want to run their own vault backend for the official Bitwarden clients without the resource demands of the official service.

read the full vaultwarden overview →

About Passbolt

Passbolt is a security first, open source password manager for teams, published here as the Passbolt Community Edition (CE) JSON API under the AGPL 3.0 licence and built for organizations that need to centralize, organize and share passwords and secrets on infrastructure they control.

read the full Passbolt overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs passbolt bitwarden vs passbolt keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs 2fas keepassxc vs pearpass openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

vaultwarden vs KeePassXC vaultwarden vs Bitwarden vaultwarden vs Aegis Authenticator vaultwarden vs Padloc vaultwarden vs 2FAS vaultwarden vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is vaultwarden or Passbolt more popular?

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars and Passbolt has 6,127. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are vaultwarden and Passbolt free?

Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Passbolt under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vaultwarden and Passbolt?

vaultwarden is written in Rust and Passbolt in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vaultwarden or Passbolt?

Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (67,795 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Passbolt if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.