head to head · open source

Passbolt vs 2FAS

Passbolt has 6,127 GitHub stars, 400 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. 2FAS has 1,514 stars, 130 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Passbolt leads on adoption by 305% (6,127 vs 1,514 stars). Passbolt is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; 2FAS is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Passbolt has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, 2FAS 9%. Passbolt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Passbolt ★ 6.1K 2FAS ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Passbolt 2FAS
GitHub stars ★ 6.1K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in PHP Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 400 ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Passbolt if

  • You weight community size — 6.1K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Passbolt profile →

pick 2FAS if

  • You want the 2FAS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and 2FAS fits your workflow better

full 2FAS profile →

About Passbolt

Passbolt is a security first, open source password manager for teams, published here as the Passbolt Community Edition (CE) JSON API under the AGPL 3.0 licence and built for organizations that need to centralize, organize and share passwords and secrets on infrastructure they control.

read the full Passbolt overview →

About 2FAS

2FAS is an open source Android application for two factor authentication, and its listing describes it as a local first 2FA authenticator and password manager. The project lives in the password and secret management ecosystem, and the repository contains the source code for the 2FAS Auth Android app, written in Kotlin and licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0. The README presents 2FAS as an authentication method that adds a second factor, such as a one time password shown on a phone, alongside a username and password.

read the full 2FAS overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs passbolt keepassxc vs 2fas bitwarden vs passbolt keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs pearpass n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

Passbolt vs KeePassXC Passbolt vs Bitwarden Passbolt vs Aegis Authenticator Passbolt vs Padloc Passbolt vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is Passbolt or 2FAS more popular?

Passbolt has 6,127 GitHub stars and 2FAS has 1,514. Passbolt has the larger community by that measure.

Are Passbolt and 2FAS free?

Both are open source. Passbolt is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and 2FAS under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Passbolt and 2FAS?

Passbolt is written in PHP and 2FAS in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Passbolt or 2FAS?

Choose Passbolt if you want the larger community (6,127 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose 2FAS if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.