head to head · open source

vaultwarden vs PearPass

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars, 3,228 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. PearPass has 535 stars, 71 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 12,572% (67,795 vs 535 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; PearPass is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, PearPass 13%. vaultwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vaultwarden ★ 68K PearPass ★ 535 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

vaultwarden PearPass
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 535
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-08-14
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vaultwarden if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vaultwarden profile →

pick PearPass if

  • You want the PearPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and PearPass fits your workflow better

full PearPass profile →

About vaultwarden

Vaultwarden is an unofficial, Bitwarden compatible server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API written in Rust, aimed at self hosters who want to run their own vault backend for the official Bitwarden clients without the resource demands of the official service.

read the full vaultwarden overview →

About PearPass

PearPass is an open source, end to end encrypted password and identity manager for macOS, Linux, and Windows that keeps credentials encrypted on disk and syncs them directly between devices over Pear Runtime rather than through a central server.

read the full PearPass overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs pearpass keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs passbolt bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs 2fas bitwarden vs passbolt openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

vaultwarden vs KeePassXC vaultwarden vs Bitwarden vaultwarden vs Aegis Authenticator vaultwarden vs Passbolt vaultwarden vs Padloc vaultwarden vs 2FAS

Frequently asked questions

Is vaultwarden or PearPass more popular?

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars and PearPass has 535. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are vaultwarden and PearPass free?

Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and PearPass has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between vaultwarden and PearPass?

vaultwarden is written in Rust and PearPass in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vaultwarden or PearPass?

Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (67,795 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PearPass if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.