head to head · open source
vaultwarden vs PearPass
vaultwarden has 70,127 GitHub stars, 3,400 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PearPass has 542 stars, 72 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 12,839% (70,127 vs 542 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; PearPass is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, PearPass 13%. vaultwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vaultwarden | PearPass | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 70K | ★ 542 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.4K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vaultwarden if
- You weight community size — 70K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick PearPass if
- You want the PearPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and PearPass fits your workflow better
About vaultwarden
An alternative server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API, written in Rust and compatible with official Bitwarden clients [disclaimer], perfect for self hosted deployment where running the official resource heavy service might not be ideal. %3D'svg'%5D%2F %5Blocal name()%3D'g'%5D%5B2%5D%2F %5Blocal name()%3D'text'%5D%5B4%5D&style=flat square&logo=rust&label=dependencies&color=005AA4) [!IMPORTANT] When using this server, please report any bugs or suggestions directly to us (see Get in touch), regardless of whatever clients you are using (mobile, desktop, browser...). DO NOT use the official Bitwarden…
read the full vaultwarden overview →
About PearPass
[!WARNING] 🍐 PearPass is currently paused from active development, so please use at your own caution until further notice. PearPass Desktop The desktop app for PearPass, an open source, end to end encrypted password and identity manager built on Pear Runtime. Table of Contents Introduction Features Installation Usage Examples Logging Testing Staging to Dev Workspace Dependencies Dependencies Related Projects Contributing License Introduction PearPass is an open source, privacy first password and identity manager that gives you full control over your sensitive information. It makes storing and managing your…
read the full PearPass overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Password & Secret Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vaultwarden or PearPass more popular?
vaultwarden has 70,127 GitHub stars and PearPass has 542. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.
Are vaultwarden and PearPass free?
Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and PearPass has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between vaultwarden and PearPass?
vaultwarden is written in Rust and PearPass in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vaultwarden or PearPass?
Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (70,127 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PearPass if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.