head to head · open source

KeePassXC vs Bitwarden

KeePassXC has 28,843 GitHub stars, 1,910 forks, 910 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Bitwarden has 20,156 stars, 1,772 forks, 230 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KeePassXC leads on adoption by 43% (28,843 vs 20,156 stars). KeePassXC is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; Bitwarden is written in C# under a custom or non-standard licence. KeePassXC has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Bitwarden 9%. Bitwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

KeePassXC ★ 29K Bitwarden ★ 20K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

KeePassXC Bitwarden
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 20K
License Custom / other Custom / other
Written in C++ C#
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick KeePassXC if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full KeePassXC profile →

pick Bitwarden if

  • You want the Bitwarden feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Bitwarden fits your workflow better

full Bitwarden profile →

About KeePassXC

KeePassXC is a cross platform, open source password manager derived from the Windows application KeePass Password Safe. It runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux, storing sensitive data—such as usernames, passwords, URLs, notes, and file attachments—in a single, encrypted database file using the KDBX format (KDBX4 and KDBX3). The project is community driven, hosted on GitHub, and maintained under the NOASSERTION license.

read the full KeePassXC overview →

About Bitwarden

Bitwarden Server is the backend infrastructure for Bitwarden client applications, and it lives in the .NET ecosystem. The repository contains the APIs, database, and core services that support secure password management for individuals and businesses.

read the full Bitwarden overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs passbolt bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs 2fas keepassxc vs pearpass bitwarden vs passbolt n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

KeePassXC vs Aegis Authenticator KeePassXC vs Passbolt KeePassXC vs Padloc KeePassXC vs 2FAS KeePassXC vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is KeePassXC or Bitwarden more popular?

KeePassXC has 28,843 GitHub stars and Bitwarden has 20,156. KeePassXC has the larger community by that measure.

Are KeePassXC and Bitwarden free?

Neither KeePassXC nor Bitwarden declares a licence in this registry, so check each project's own repository before relying on either for a commercial use. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between KeePassXC and Bitwarden?

KeePassXC is written in C++ and Bitwarden in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, KeePassXC or Bitwarden?

Choose KeePassXC if you want the larger community (28,843 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Bitwarden if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.