head to head · open source
n8n vs Browser Use
n8n has 209,375 GitHub stars, 61,361 forks, 1,143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use has 119,857 stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. n8n leads on adoption by 75% (209,375 vs 119,857 stars). n8n is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Browser Use is written in Python under MIT. n8n has attracted 29% as many forks as stars, Browser Use 11%. n8n was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| n8n | Browser Use | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 209K | ★ 120K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 61K | ⑂ 13K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick n8n if
- You weight community size — 209K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Browser Use if
- You want the Browser Use feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Browser Use fits your workflow better
About n8n
n8n – The Platform for AI Agents and Workflow Automation Fair code platform to build and deploy AI agents and workflows. Combine a visual canvas with custom code, run it self hosted or in the cloud, and connect to 1500+ integrations. AI automation you can trust with real work, from prototype to production. Key Capabilities AI Native Automation Platform : Build and operationalize AI workflows and multi step agents using your own data, models, and tools Model Flexibility, No Lock In : Connect to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or open source models and switch providers without changing your architecture From Prototype…
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is n8n or Browser Use more popular?
n8n has 209,375 GitHub stars and Browser Use has 119,857. n8n has the larger community by that measure.
Are n8n and Browser Use free?
Both are open source. n8n has no licence declared in this registry, and Browser Use is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between n8n and Browser Use?
n8n is written in TypeScript and Browser Use in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, n8n or Browser Use?
Choose n8n if you want the larger community (209,375 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Browser Use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.