head to head · open source

vaultwarden vs Aegis Authenticator

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars, 3,228 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Aegis Authenticator has 13,114 stars, 590 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 417% (67,795 vs 13,114 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; Aegis Authenticator is written in Java under GPL-3.0. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Aegis Authenticator 4%. vaultwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vaultwarden ★ 68K Aegis Authenticator ★ 13K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

vaultwarden Aegis Authenticator
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 13K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Java
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 590
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vaultwarden if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vaultwarden profile →

pick Aegis Authenticator if

  • You want the Aegis Authenticator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Aegis Authenticator fits your workflow better

full Aegis Authenticator profile →

About vaultwarden

Vaultwarden is an unofficial, Bitwarden compatible server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API written in Rust, aimed at self hosters who want to run their own vault backend for the official Bitwarden clients without the resource demands of the official service.

read the full vaultwarden overview →

About Aegis Authenticator

Aegis Authenticator is a free and open source Android application for managing two step verification tokens. It is written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 license, and it belongs to the Android productivity and secret management ecosystem.

read the full Aegis Authenticator overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs passbolt keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs 2fas keepassxc vs pearpass bitwarden vs passbolt openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

vaultwarden vs KeePassXC vaultwarden vs Bitwarden vaultwarden vs Passbolt vaultwarden vs Padloc vaultwarden vs 2FAS vaultwarden vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is vaultwarden or Aegis Authenticator more popular?

vaultwarden has 67,795 GitHub stars and Aegis Authenticator has 13,114. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are vaultwarden and Aegis Authenticator free?

Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Aegis Authenticator under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vaultwarden and Aegis Authenticator?

vaultwarden is written in Rust and Aegis Authenticator in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vaultwarden or Aegis Authenticator?

Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (67,795 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Aegis Authenticator if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.