head to head · open source
parlant vs macro-tasks
parlant has 18,322 GitHub stars, 1,554 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. macro-tasks has 6,128 stars, 571 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. parlant leads on adoption by 199% (18,322 vs 6,128 stars). parlant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; macro-tasks is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. parlant has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, macro-tasks 9%. macro-tasks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| parlant | macro-tasks | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 6.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 571 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick parlant if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick macro-tasks if
- You want the macro-tasks feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and macro-tasks fits your workflow better
About parlant
The interaction control harness for customer facing AI agents Website • Quick Start • Examples • Discord Deutsch Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 Looking for an open source alternative to Ada, Decagon, or Sierra? Parlant is production ready. It streamlines the development and maintenance of enterprise grade B2C (business to consumer) and sensitive B2B interactions that need to be consistent, compliant, on brand, and comprehensively traceable. Why Parlant? Conversational context engineering is hard because real world interactions are diverse, nuanced, and non linear. ❌ The Problem…
read the full parlant overview →
About macro-tasks
Sign up · Docs · Book demo · Website · Feature requests · Contribute · Hiring Macro is the all in one workspace for you and your team. It unifies email + messages + docs + tasks + agents + CRM into a single fast interface with shared team level memory. Everything in your workspace is @linked and searchable so your team (and your agents) never have to switch tools. Why Macro We built Macro because we wanted a single operating system for our startup. There are many good software products, and we used them all — Slack, Linear, Notion, HubSpot, and Superhuman — but they don't work together as one system. As we…
read the full macro-tasks overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is parlant or macro-tasks more popular?
parlant has 18,322 GitHub stars and macro-tasks has 6,128. parlant has the larger community by that measure.
Are parlant and macro-tasks free?
Both are open source. parlant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and macro-tasks under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between parlant and macro-tasks?
parlant is written in Python and macro-tasks in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, parlant or macro-tasks?
Choose parlant if you want the larger community (18,322 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose macro-tasks if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.