head to head · open source

OpenCut vs macro-tasks

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars, 8,852 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. macro-tasks has 4,345 stars, 416 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 1,964% (89,680 vs 4,345 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; macro-tasks is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, macro-tasks 10%. macro-tasks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K macro-tasks ★ 4.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut macro-tasks
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 4.3K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 416
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick macro-tasks if

  • You want the macro-tasks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and macro-tasks fits your workflow better

full macro-tasks profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About macro-tasks

Macro is an open source unified workspace named macro tasks, built in Rust and SolidJS under AGPL 3.0. It brings email, messages, docs, tasks, canvas, agents, calls, files, pull requests, and CRM into one web interface. The project lives in the Rust and SolidJS web ecosystem, with GitHub topics such as agent, ai, mcp, messaging, notes, notion, crm, email, and linear.

read the full macro-tasks overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs OpenShot OpenCut vs GIMP OpenCut vs Kdenlive OpenCut vs RawTherapee

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or macro-tasks more popular?

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars and macro-tasks has 4,345. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and macro-tasks free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and macro-tasks under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and macro-tasks?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and macro-tasks in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or macro-tasks?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,680 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose macro-tasks if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.