head to head · open source
open-design vs ui-components
open-design has 107,356 GitHub stars, 12,210 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ui-components has 1,967 stars, 96 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-design leads on adoption by 5,358% (107,356 vs 1,967 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; ui-components is written in TypeScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ui-components 5%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-design | ui-components | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 107K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 96 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-design if
- You weight community size — 107K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ui-components if
- You want the ui-components feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ui-components fits your workflow better
About open-design
OpenDesign: The open source Claude Design alternative ⚡ OpenDesign Cloud — the official model service. One recharge to use both agent and image models inside OpenDesign: GPT, Claude, and DeepSeek for agents; GPT Image 2.0, Seedream 5.0 Pro, and Nano Banana 2.0 for images. 🚀 DeepSeek V4 Flash and V4 Pro are now available. Put top tier intelligence to work across prototypes, decks, design systems, and everyday agent tasks. OpenDesign members can use both models without limits for two weeks, directly inside the app. 🧩 DeepSeek Harness is now supported. Connect DeepSeek's official dsh agent harness to OpenDesign…
read the full open-design overview →
About ui-components
beUI Motion Component Library Animated components for React and Next.js. Copy the source, own the code. Website · Components · React Native · Changelog · llms.txt Interfaces that move with intent beUI brings motion to everyday product interfaces: buttons, navigation, menus, charts, AI conversations, and games. Built with React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, and Framer Motion, with live previews and copyable usage examples. Own the source. Install individual components into your app and change them to fit your product. Compose your interface. Combine focused primitives or start with a complete block. Make motion…
read the full ui-components overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-design or ui-components more popular?
open-design has 107,356 GitHub stars and ui-components has 1,967. open-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-design and ui-components free?
Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ui-components under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-design and ui-components?
open-design is written in TypeScript and ui-components in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-design or ui-components?
Choose open-design if you want the larger community (107,356 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ui-components if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.