head to head · open source

open-design vs pts

open-design has 96,938 GitHub stars, 11,262 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pts has 5,347 stars, 182 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-design leads on adoption by 1,713% (96,938 vs 5,347 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; pts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, pts 3%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 97K pts ★ 5.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design pts
GitHub stars ★ 97K ★ 5.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 182
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 97K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick pts if

  • You want the pts feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and pts fits your workflow better

full pts profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About pts

Pts is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript and JavaScript library for visualization and creative coding, built for generative artists, designers, and developers who draw and animate geometry on canvas, in SVG, and with sound in the browser.

read the full pts overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs Figma-Context-MCP open-design vs Tkinter-Designer open-design vs pencil open-design vs dicebear open-design vs OpenPencil open-design vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or pts more popular?

open-design has 96,938 GitHub stars and pts has 5,347. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and pts free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pts under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and pts?

open-design is written in TypeScript and pts in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or pts?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (96,938 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pts if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.