head to head · open source

open-design vs Pixelorama

open-design has 98,186 GitHub stars, 11,390 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pixelorama has 10,389 stars, 553 forks, 87 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. open-design leads on adoption by 845% (98,186 vs 10,389 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Pixelorama is written in GDScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Pixelorama 5%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 98K Pixelorama ★ 10K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design Pixelorama
GitHub stars ★ 98K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript GDScript
Last push 2026-09-26 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 553
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 98K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick Pixelorama if

  • You want the Pixelorama feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches GDScript
  • You evaluated both and Pixelorama fits your workflow better

full Pixelorama profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About Pixelorama

Pixelorama is a free, MIT licensed pixel art multitool written in GDScript for the Godot engine, built for pixel artists, sprite animators and game developers working on Windows, Linux, macOS and the web.

read the full Pixelorama overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or Pixelorama more popular?

open-design has 98,186 GitHub stars and Pixelorama has 10,389. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and Pixelorama free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pixelorama under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and Pixelorama?

open-design is written in TypeScript and Pixelorama in GDScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or Pixelorama?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (98,186 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pixelorama if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.