head to head · open source

open-design vs figma-use

open-design has 99,461 GitHub stars, 11,505 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. figma-use has 606 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. open-design leads on adoption by 16,313% (99,461 vs 606 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, figma-use 7%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 99K figma-use ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design figma-use
GitHub stars ★ 99K ★ 606
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 99K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick figma-use if

  • You want the figma-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and figma-use fits your workflow better

full figma-use profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K OpenCut ★ 92K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or figma-use more popular?

open-design has 99,461 GitHub stars and figma-use has 606. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and figma-use free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and figma-use under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and figma-use?

open-design is written in TypeScript and figma-use in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or figma-use?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (99,461 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose figma-use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.