head to head · open source

neko vs M3UAndroid

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. M3UAndroid has 1,252 stars, 158 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 1,682% (22,315 vs 1,252 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; M3UAndroid is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, M3UAndroid 13%. M3UAndroid was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K M3UAndroid ★ 1.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko M3UAndroid
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 158
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick M3UAndroid if

  • You want the M3UAndroid feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and M3UAndroid fits your workflow better

full M3UAndroid profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About M3UAndroid

M3UAndroid is an open source IPTV player for Android phones, tablets, and Android TV. It lives in the Android ecosystem, is written in Kotlin, uses Jetpack Compose, and is licensed under GPL 3.0. The project targets users who want a clean, practical, ad free way to watch IPTV streams from their own playlist sources.

read the full M3UAndroid overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or M3UAndroid more popular?

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars and M3UAndroid has 1,252. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and M3UAndroid free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and M3UAndroid under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and M3UAndroid?

neko is written in Go and M3UAndroid in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or M3UAndroid?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,315 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose M3UAndroid if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.