head to head · open source

Navidrome vs podsync

Navidrome has 23,651 GitHub stars, 1,710 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped yesterday. podsync has 1,961 stars, 314 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Navidrome leads on adoption by 1,106% (23,651 vs 1,961 stars). Navidrome is written in Go under GPL-3.0; podsync is written in Go under MIT. Navidrome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, podsync 16%. Navidrome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Navidrome ★ 24K podsync ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Navidrome podsync
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.0K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 314
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Navidrome if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Navidrome profile →

pick podsync if

  • You want the podsync feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and podsync fits your workflow better

full podsync profile →

About Navidrome

Navidrome is an open source, web based music collection server and streamer written in Go and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It lives in the self hosted media server ecosystem and is intended for users who want to listen to a personal music collection from a browser or mobile device.

read the full Navidrome overview →

About podsync

Podsync is a free, MIT licensed Go service that turns YouTube or Vimeo channels, users, or playlists into podcast feeds, and it is built for people who want YouTube and Vimeo content delivered through a podcast client instead of the platforms' own apps.

read the full podsync overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Navidrome vs Jellyfin Navidrome vs Invidious Navidrome vs neko Navidrome vs Kodi Navidrome vs Nuclear Navidrome vs PeerTube Navidrome vs iptv-sources Navidrome vs ansible-nas Navidrome vs Anthias Navidrome vs tvheadend Navidrome vs Ghosten-Player Navidrome vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Navidrome or podsync more popular?

Navidrome has 23,651 GitHub stars and podsync has 1,961. Navidrome has the larger community by that measure.

Are Navidrome and podsync free?

Both are open source. Navidrome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and podsync under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Navidrome and podsync?

Navidrome is written in Go and podsync in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Navidrome or podsync?

Choose Navidrome if you want the larger community (23,651 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose podsync if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.