head to head · open source

manim vs visual-center

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars, 7,724 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. visual-center has 1,450 stars, 40 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. manim leads on adoption by 6,386% (94,045 vs 1,450 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; visual-center is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, visual-center 3%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K visual-center ★ 1.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim visual-center
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 1.4K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-08-23
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 40
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick visual-center if

  • You want the visual-center feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and visual-center fits your workflow better

full visual-center profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About visual-center

Visual Center is a JavaScript tool, published as an npm package and hosted as a web app at https://javier.xyz/visual center, that finds the visual center of an image or logo so the mark can be placed correctly inside a container, and it is built for designers, brand teams and frontend developers who currently align logos by eye.

read the full visual-center overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer manim vs pencil manim vs dicebear manim vs OpenPencil manim vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or visual-center more popular?

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars and visual-center has 1,450. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and visual-center free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and visual-center under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and visual-center?

manim is written in Python and visual-center in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or visual-center?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,045 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose visual-center if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.