head to head · open source

manim vs Quant-UX

manim has 94,088 GitHub stars, 7,728 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Quant-UX has 2,716 stars, 286 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. manim leads on adoption by 3,364% (94,088 vs 2,716 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; Quant-UX is written in Vue under GPL-3.0. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Quant-UX 11%. Quant-UX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K Quant-UX ★ 2.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim Quant-UX
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 2.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Vue
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 286
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick Quant-UX if

  • You want the Quant-UX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and Quant-UX fits your workflow better

full Quant-UX profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About Quant-UX

Quant UX is open source research, usability, prototyping tool. It lives in Vue ecosystem, uses GPL 3.0 license, GitHub category Miscellaneous / Design & Prototyping. This repo contains front end. Working demo exists at quant ux.com. Project lets designers build prototypes, run tests, collect data, learn from results. GitHub metadata lists 2712 stars, 287 forks, 0 contributors, 109 open issues.

read the full Quant-UX overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs quant-ux ant-design vs open-design firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs motion manim vs layui manim vs lottie-ios manim vs vant manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or Quant-UX more popular?

manim has 94,088 GitHub stars and Quant-UX has 2,716. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and Quant-UX free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and Quant-UX under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and Quant-UX?

manim is written in Python and Quant-UX in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or Quant-UX?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,088 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Quant-UX if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.