head to head · open source

manim vs pts

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars, 7,724 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. pts has 5,347 stars, 182 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. manim leads on adoption by 1,659% (94,045 vs 5,347 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; pts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, pts 3%. pts was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K pts ★ 5.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim pts
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 5.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 182
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick pts if

  • You want the pts feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and pts fits your workflow better

full pts profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About pts

Pts is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript and JavaScript library for visualization and creative coding, built for generative artists, designers, and developers who draw and animate geometry on canvas, in SVG, and with sound in the browser.

read the full pts overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer manim vs pencil manim vs dicebear manim vs OpenPencil manim vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or pts more popular?

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars and pts has 5,347. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and pts free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and pts under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and pts?

manim is written in Python and pts in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or pts?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,045 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pts if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.