head to head · open source

manim vs auto-animate

manim has 94,132 GitHub stars, 7,734 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. auto-animate has 13,924 stars, 260 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. manim leads on adoption by 576% (94,132 vs 13,924 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; auto-animate is written in TypeScript under MIT. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, auto-animate 2%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K auto-animate ★ 14K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim auto-animate
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 14K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick auto-animate if

  • You want the auto-animate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and auto-animate fits your workflow better

full auto-animate profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About auto-animate

AutoAnimate is a zero config, drop in animation utility that adds smooth transitions to a web application with a single line of code, aimed at JavaScript, React, Vue, and Solid developers who want motion in their interfaces without hand writing animation logic.

read the full auto-animate overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim ant-design vs open-design firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs motion manim vs layui manim vs lottie-ios manim vs vant manim vs primitives manim vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or auto-animate more popular?

manim has 94,132 GitHub stars and auto-animate has 13,924. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and auto-animate free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and auto-animate under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and auto-animate?

manim is written in Python and auto-animate in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or auto-animate?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,132 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-animate if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.