head to head · open source

Chatwoot vs libredesk

Chatwoot has 37,381 GitHub stars, 9,096 forks, 1,377 open issues and last shipped today. libredesk has 2,982 stars, 289 forks, 87 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Chatwoot leads on adoption by 1,154% (37,381 vs 2,982 stars). Chatwoot is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence; libredesk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Chatwoot has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, libredesk 10%. Chatwoot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (chat-widget, customer-support, intercom, livechat), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Chatwoot ★ 37K libredesk ★ 3.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Chatwoot libredesk
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 3.0K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in Ruby Go
Last push 2026-10-01 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 9.1K ⑂ 289
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Chatwoot if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Chatwoot profile →

pick libredesk if

  • You want the libredesk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and libredesk fits your workflow better

full libredesk profile →

About Chatwoot

Chatwoot is a Ruby based, open source, self hosted customer support platform that consolidates live chat, email, and social messaging into one omnichannel inbox, positioned as an open alternative to Intercom, Twilio, Zendesk, and Salesforce Service Cloud.

read the full Chatwoot overview →

About libredesk

Libredesk is an open source, self hosted customer support desk written in Go under AGPL 3.0. It is a lightweight alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, and Chatwoot, and it puts live chat, email, and support workflows into a single binary. It lives in the open source Go customer support ecosystem.

read the full libredesk overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

chatwoot vs botpress chatwoot vs glpi chatwoot vs zammad chatwoot vs chaskiq chatwoot vs frappe-helpdesk chatwoot vs deskcommcrm chatwoot vs goflylivechat opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext

More Customer Support & Success projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.

Chatwoot vs glpi Chatwoot vs Zammad Chatwoot vs DeskcommCRM Chatwoot vs Chaskiq Chatwoot vs Frappe Helpdesk Chatwoot vs goflylivechat Chatwoot vs Usertour Chatwoot vs TikTokLive Chatwoot vs iTop Chatwoot vs rt Chatwoot vs chatwoot-mobile-app Chatwoot vs Cossistant

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatwoot or libredesk more popular?

Chatwoot has 37,381 GitHub stars and libredesk has 2,982. Chatwoot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Chatwoot and libredesk free?

Both are open source. Chatwoot has no licence declared in this registry, and libredesk is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Chatwoot and libredesk?

Chatwoot is written in Ruby and libredesk in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Chatwoot or libredesk?

Choose Chatwoot if you want the larger community (37,381 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose libredesk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.