head to head · open source

KeePassXC vs 2FAS

KeePassXC has 28,843 GitHub stars, 1,910 forks, 910 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. 2FAS has 1,514 stars, 130 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. KeePassXC leads on adoption by 1,805% (28,843 vs 1,514 stars). KeePassXC is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; 2FAS is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. KeePassXC has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, 2FAS 9%. KeePassXC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

KeePassXC ★ 29K 2FAS ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

KeePassXC 2FAS
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.5K
License Custom / other GPL-3.0
Written in C++ Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick KeePassXC if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full KeePassXC profile →

pick 2FAS if

  • You want the 2FAS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and 2FAS fits your workflow better

full 2FAS profile →

About KeePassXC

KeePassXC is a cross platform, open source password manager derived from the Windows application KeePass Password Safe. It runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux, storing sensitive data—such as usernames, passwords, URLs, notes, and file attachments—in a single, encrypted database file using the KDBX format (KDBX4 and KDBX3). The project is community driven, hosted on GitHub, and maintained under the NOASSERTION license.

read the full KeePassXC overview →

About 2FAS

2FAS is an open source Android application for two factor authentication, and its listing describes it as a local first 2FA authenticator and password manager. The project lives in the password and secret management ecosystem, and the repository contains the source code for the 2FAS Auth Android app, written in Kotlin and licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0. The README presents 2FAS as an authentication method that adds a second factor, such as a one time password shown on a phone, alongside a username and password.

read the full 2FAS overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs bitwarden keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs passbolt keepassxc vs padloc keepassxc vs pearpass bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator bitwarden vs passbolt n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

KeePassXC vs Bitwarden KeePassXC vs Aegis Authenticator KeePassXC vs Passbolt KeePassXC vs Padloc KeePassXC vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is KeePassXC or 2FAS more popular?

KeePassXC has 28,843 GitHub stars and 2FAS has 1,514. KeePassXC has the larger community by that measure.

Are KeePassXC and 2FAS free?

Both are open source. KeePassXC has no licence declared in this registry, and 2FAS is licensed under GPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between KeePassXC and 2FAS?

KeePassXC is written in C++ and 2FAS in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, KeePassXC or 2FAS?

Choose KeePassXC if you want the larger community (28,843 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose 2FAS if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.