head to head · open source

Immich vs WR.DO

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars, 6,980 forks, 740 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,280 stars, 365 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Immich leads on adoption by 4,920% (114,457 vs 2,280 stars). Immich is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. Immich has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. Immich was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Immich ★ 114K WR.DO ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Immich WR.DO
GitHub stars ★ 114K ★ 2.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 7.0K ⑂ 365
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Immich if

  • You weight community size — 114K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Immich profile →

pick WR.DO if

  • You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better

full WR.DO profile →

About Immich

Immich is a high performance self hosted photo and video management solution — an AGPL 3.0 TypeScript project — for people and households who want their photo library on a server they own rather than in Google Photos.

read the full Immich overview →

About WR.DO

WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.

read the full WR.DO overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex immich vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do immich vs plakar immich vs pluton paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Immich vs Paperless-ngx Immich vs Ceph Immich vs Filestash Immich vs Garage Immich vs Storj Immich vs Alarik Immich vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Immich or WR.DO more popular?

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,280. Immich has the larger community by that measure.

Are Immich and WR.DO free?

Both are open source. Immich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Immich and WR.DO?

Immich is written in TypeScript and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Immich or WR.DO?

Choose Immich if you want the larger community (114,457 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.