head to head · open source

hyperframes vs Gum

hyperframes has 51,439 GitHub stars, 4,685 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped today. Gum has 620 stars, 81 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. hyperframes leads on adoption by 8,197% (51,439 vs 620 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Gum is written in C# under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Gum 13%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 51K Gum ★ 620 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes Gum
GitHub stars ★ 51K ★ 620
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 51K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick Gum if

  • You want the Gum feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Gum fits your workflow better

full Gum profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About Gum

Gum is an MIT licensed C UI layout tool built on object oriented principles, distributed as NuGet runtimes for MonoGame, KNI, raylib, SkiaSharp, MAUI and FNA, and intended for developers who need one flexible, inheritance driven layout system across game engines and .NET platforms.

read the full Gum overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs Figma-Context-MCP hyperframes vs Tkinter-Designer hyperframes vs pencil hyperframes vs dicebear

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or Gum more popular?

hyperframes has 51,439 GitHub stars and Gum has 620. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and Gum free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gum under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and Gum?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and Gum in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or Gum?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (51,439 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Gum if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.