head to head · open source

hyperframes vs charm

hyperframes has 51,348 GitHub stars, 4,675 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. charm has 649 stars, 169 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 7,812% (51,348 vs 649 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; charm is written in Python under LGPL-3.0. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, charm 26%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 51K charm ★ 649 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes charm
GitHub stars ★ 51K ★ 649
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 169
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 51K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick charm if

  • You want the charm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and charm fits your workflow better

full charm profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About charm

Charm (Charm Crypto) is a Python based framework for rapidly prototyping advanced cryptosystems — attribute based encryption, identity based encryption, pairing based schemes, threshold ECDSA, and zero knowledge proofs — built for researchers and engineers who need working schemes without hand writing the underlying mathematics.

read the full charm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs Figma-Context-MCP hyperframes vs Tkinter-Designer hyperframes vs pencil hyperframes vs dicebear hyperframes vs OpenPencil hyperframes vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or charm more popular?

hyperframes has 51,348 GitHub stars and charm has 649. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and charm free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and charm under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and charm?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and charm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or charm?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (51,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose charm if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.