head to head · open source

homebridge vs integration

homebridge has 25,499 GitHub stars, 2,011 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. integration has 7,738 stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. homebridge leads on adoption by 230% (25,499 vs 7,738 stars). homebridge is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; integration is written in Python under MIT. homebridge has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, integration 21%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

homebridge ★ 25K integration ★ 7.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

homebridge integration
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 7.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-08-30 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick homebridge if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full homebridge profile →

pick integration if

  • You want the integration feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and integration fits your workflow better

full integration profile →

About homebridge

Homebridge is a lightweight, free and open source Node.js server that emulates the HomeKit Accessory Protocol (HAP) on a home network, so that smart home devices without native HomeKit support can be controlled through Apple's Home app and Siri.

read the full homebridge overview →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

homebridge vs Home Assistant homebridge vs frigate homebridge vs oomwoo homebridge vs espectre homebridge vs hass-xiaomi-miot homebridge vs CrateDB homebridge vs python-miio homebridge vs OpenMQTTGateway homebridge vs android homebridge vs domoticz homebridge vs IRremoteESP8266 homebridge vs linux-android

Frequently asked questions

Is homebridge or integration more popular?

homebridge has 25,499 GitHub stars and integration has 7,738. homebridge has the larger community by that measure.

Are homebridge and integration free?

Both are open source. homebridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and integration under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between homebridge and integration?

homebridge is written in TypeScript and integration in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, homebridge or integration?

Choose homebridge if you want the larger community (25,499 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose integration if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.