head to head · open source
Home Assistant vs power-flow-card-plus
Home Assistant has 92,081 GitHub stars, 39,242 forks, 3,527 open issues and last shipped yesterday. power-flow-card-plus has 1,209 stars, 190 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Home Assistant leads on adoption by 7,516% (92,081 vs 1,209 stars). Home Assistant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; power-flow-card-plus is written in various languages under MIT. Home Assistant has attracted 43% as many forks as stars, power-flow-card-plus 16%. Home Assistant was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Home Assistant | power-flow-card-plus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-09 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 39K | ⑂ 190 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Home Assistant if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick power-flow-card-plus if
- You want the power-flow-card-plus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and power-flow-card-plus fits your workflow better
About Home Assistant
Home Assistant Chat Status ================================================================================= Open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Check out home assistant.io for a demo , installation instructions , tutorials and documentation . Featured integrations The system is built using a modular approach so support for other devices or actions can be implemented easily. See also the section on architecture and the section on creating your own components…
read the full Home Assistant overview →
About power-flow-card-plus
Power Flow Card Plus [!TIP] 📖 Full documentation: cards.flixlix.com/power flow card plus The docs site has the complete configuration reference, an interactive configurator with copy pasteable YAML, and ready made examples — much easier to navigate than this README. Installation Configuration reference Interactive configurator Examples [!NOTE] This card is distributed via flixlix/power flow card plus, but the source code lives in the monorepo at flixlix/flixlix cards. Issues and feature requests will be tracked there going forward. Additional Features / Enhancements UI Editor!!! 🥳 Multiple Language support…
read the full power-flow-card-plus overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Home Assistant or power-flow-card-plus more popular?
Home Assistant has 92,081 GitHub stars and power-flow-card-plus has 1,209. Home Assistant has the larger community by that measure.
Are Home Assistant and power-flow-card-plus free?
Both are open source. Home Assistant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and power-flow-card-plus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Home Assistant and power-flow-card-plus?
Home Assistant is written in Python and power-flow-card-plus in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Home Assistant or power-flow-card-plus?
Choose Home Assistant if you want the larger community (92,081 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose power-flow-card-plus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.