head to head · open source
hass-xiaomi-miot vs HAsmartirrigation
hass-xiaomi-miot has 6,224 GitHub stars, 882 forks, 929 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. HAsmartirrigation has 565 stars, 95 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hass-xiaomi-miot leads on adoption by 1,002% (6,224 vs 565 stars). hass-xiaomi-miot is written in Python under Apache-2.0; HAsmartirrigation is written in Python under MIT. hass-xiaomi-miot has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, HAsmartirrigation 17%. HAsmartirrigation was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (homeassistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hass-xiaomi-miot | HAsmartirrigation | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.2K | ★ 565 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 882 | ⑂ 95 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hass-xiaomi-miot if
- You weight community size — 6.2K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HAsmartirrigation if
- You want the HAsmartirrigation feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and HAsmartirrigation fits your workflow better
About hass-xiaomi-miot
Xiaomi Miot For HomeAssistant English 简体中文 MIoT Spec: The protocol specification for Xiaomi IoT devices, is a standard designed by the Xiaomi IoT platform to describe the function definition of hardware products according to the networking mode of hardware products, the characteristics of product functions, the characteristics of user usage scenarios and the user's requirements for hardware product use experience specification. This component uses the miot protocol to automatically integrate Xiaomi devices into HomeAssistant, and currently supports most Xiaomi IoT devices. And it supports HA Web UI, and you can…
read the full hass-xiaomi-miot overview →
About HAsmartirrigation
[![release][release badge]][release url] [release url]: [release badge]: Smart Irrigation Smart Irrigation was created by Jeroen ter Heerdt; all credit for the original integration and its evapotranspiration model goes to him. It is now actively maintained here, with the rough edges of the configuration UI and plumbing smoothed out. This integration calculates the time to run your irrigation system to compensate for moisture loss by evapotranspiration. Using this integration you water your garden, lawn or crops precisely enough to compensate what has evaporated. It takes into account precipitation (rain, snow)…
read the full HAsmartirrigation overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hass-xiaomi-miot or HAsmartirrigation more popular?
hass-xiaomi-miot has 6,224 GitHub stars and HAsmartirrigation has 565. hass-xiaomi-miot has the larger community by that measure.
Are hass-xiaomi-miot and HAsmartirrigation free?
Both are open source. hass-xiaomi-miot is licensed under Apache-2.0 and HAsmartirrigation under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hass-xiaomi-miot and HAsmartirrigation?
hass-xiaomi-miot is written in Python and HAsmartirrigation in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hass-xiaomi-miot or HAsmartirrigation?
Choose hass-xiaomi-miot if you want the larger community (6,224 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose HAsmartirrigation if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.