head to head · open source
espectre vs HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control
espectre has 9,728 GitHub stars, 739 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control has 2,043 stars, 167 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. espectre leads on adoption by 376% (9,728 vs 2,043 stars). espectre is written in Python under GPL-3.0; HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control is written in Python under Apache-2.0. espectre has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control 8%. espectre was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| espectre | HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.7K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 739 | ⑂ 167 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick espectre if
- You weight community size — 9.7K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control if
- You want the HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control fits your workflow better
About espectre
ESPectre Turn an ESP32 into a private, local Wi Fi motion sensor. When someone moves through a room, they change the way Wi Fi signals travel through it. ESPectre reads those changes and reports motion in real time. No camera, no microphone, no wearable, and no dedicated radar hardware: just a supported ESP32 and the Wi Fi network already in the room. ESPectre is an open source platform that brings together ready to flash firmware, an embeddable C++ SDK, a MicroPython implementation, browser tools, a host CLI, an open dataset, open model weights, and the research workflow used to build and validate the…
read the full espectre overview →
About HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control
HomeAssistant Tapo: Cameras Control Custom component Tapo: Cameras Control to add Tapo cameras, doorbells and chimes into Home Assistant ⭐ Now also exposing a stream for devices that have no RTSP or ONVIF capabilities. Contributing Before opening a pull request, read CONTRIBUTING.md, especially if the work used an AI assistant. AI assisted contributions are welcome when the author has reviewed, understood, and can explain the changes. Purely AI generated or "vibe coded" PRs where the author did not review the code and behavior are not welcome and may be closed. Reviewing unverified generated code often takes…
read the full HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is espectre or HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control more popular?
espectre has 9,728 GitHub stars and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control has 2,043. espectre has the larger community by that measure.
Are espectre and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control free?
Both are open source. espectre is licensed under GPL-3.0 and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between espectre and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control?
espectre is written in Python and HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, espectre or HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control?
Choose espectre if you want the larger community (9,728 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose HomeAssistant-Tapo-Control if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.