head to head · open source

ECC vs profiler

ECC has 275,269 GitHub stars, 41,120 forks, 266 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. profiler has 1,536 stars, 496 forks, 862 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 17,821% (275,269 vs 1,536 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; profiler is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, profiler 32%. profiler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 275K profiler ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC profiler
GitHub stars ★ 275K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 275K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick profiler if

  • You want the profiler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and profiler fits your workflow better

full profiler profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About profiler

Firefox Profiler is an open source web application for visualizing performance profiles recorded from Firefox and other profilers, built for developers and Mozilla engineers who need to diagnose slow pages, scripts, and browser behaviour.

read the full profiler overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or profiler more popular?

ECC has 275,269 GitHub stars and profiler has 1,536. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and profiler free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and profiler under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and profiler?

ECC is written in JavaScript and profiler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or profiler?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (275,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose profiler if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.