head to head · open source

ECC vs illa-builder

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. illa-builder has 12,331 stars, 1,210 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 2,115% (273,125 vs 12,331 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; illa-builder is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, illa-builder 10%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 273K illa-builder ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC illa-builder
GitHub stars ★ 273K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-05-27
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick illa-builder if

  • You want the illa-builder feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and illa-builder fits your workflow better

full illa-builder profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About illa-builder

ILLA Builder is an open source low code platform for developers and internal tool teams who want to build dashboards, CRUD apps, admin panels, CRMs and CMSs without hand coding the front end.

read the full illa-builder overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or illa-builder more popular?

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and illa-builder has 12,331. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and illa-builder free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and illa-builder under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and illa-builder?

ECC is written in JavaScript and illa-builder in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or illa-builder?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose illa-builder if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.