head to head · open source

ECC vs apollo-client-devtools

ECC has 276,066 GitHub stars, 41,189 forks, 225 open issues and last shipped today. apollo-client-devtools has 1,528 stars, 173 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 17,967% (276,066 vs 1,528 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; apollo-client-devtools is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, apollo-client-devtools 11%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 276K apollo-client-devtools ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC apollo-client-devtools
GitHub stars ★ 276K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 173
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 276K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick apollo-client-devtools if

  • You want the apollo-client-devtools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and apollo-client-devtools fits your workflow better

full apollo-client-devtools profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About apollo-client-devtools

Apollo Client Devtools is a free, MIT licensed browser extension for Chrome and Firefox that gives developers an "Apollo" tab in their browser inspector for debugging GraphQL applications built with Apollo Client.

read the full apollo-client-devtools overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs rea ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or apollo-client-devtools more popular?

ECC has 276,066 GitHub stars and apollo-client-devtools has 1,528. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and apollo-client-devtools free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and apollo-client-devtools under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and apollo-client-devtools?

ECC is written in JavaScript and apollo-client-devtools in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or apollo-client-devtools?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (276,066 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apollo-client-devtools if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.