head to head · open source

DBeaver vs undb

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. undb has 2,980 stars, 156 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 1.2 years ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 1,638% (51,791 vs 2,980 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; undb is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, undb 5%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K undb ★ 3.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver undb
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 3.0K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-07-13
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 156
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick undb if

  • You want the undb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and undb fits your workflow better

full undb profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About undb

undb is a local first, offline first no code database platform that also serves as a backend as a service. It lives in the open source no code database and BaaS ecosystem, and it is written in TypeScript with SQLite as its database engine. The project provides a table management UI, and it can be packaged into a single binary with Bun or run as a Docker service.

read the full undb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or undb more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and undb has 2,980. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and undb free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and undb under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and undb?

DBeaver is written in Java and undb in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or undb?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose undb if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.