head to head · open source

DBeaver vs drawDB

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. drawDB has 39,572 stars, 3,248 forks, 241 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 31% (51,791 vs 39,572 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; drawDB is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, drawDB 8%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, erd), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K drawDB ★ 40K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver drawDB
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 40K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick drawDB if

  • You want the drawDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and drawDB fits your workflow better

full drawDB profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About drawDB

drawDB is a free, open source, browser based database entity relationship diagram (ERD) editor and SQL generator for developers, data modellers, and teams who need to design database schemas and turn them into SQL scripts without creating an account.

read the full drawDB overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb DBeaver vs InfluxDB

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or drawDB more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and drawDB has 39,572. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and drawDB free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and drawDB under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and drawDB?

DBeaver is written in Java and drawDB in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or drawDB?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose drawDB if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.