head to head · open source

copyparty vs vifm

copyparty has 46,853 GitHub stars, 1,903 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vifm has 3,279 stars, 146 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,329% (46,853 vs 3,279 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; vifm is written in C under GPL-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, vifm 4%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K vifm ★ 3.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty vifm
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 3.3K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 146
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick vifm if

  • You want the vifm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and vifm fits your workflow better

full vifm profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About vifm

Vifm is a curses based, Vim like file manager for the terminal that gives people who already use Vim complete keyboard control over their files without having to learn a new set of commands.

read the full vifm overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or vifm more popular?

copyparty has 46,853 GitHub stars and vifm has 3,279. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and vifm free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and vifm under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and vifm?

copyparty is written in Python and vifm in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or vifm?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,853 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose vifm if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.