head to head · open source

copyparty vs superfile

copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. superfile has 23,287 stars, 855 forks, 269 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 101% (46,732 vs 23,287 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; superfile is written in Go under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, superfile 4%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K superfile ★ 23K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty superfile
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 855
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick superfile if

  • You want the superfile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and superfile fits your workflow better

full superfile profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About superfile

superfile is a modern terminal file manager, written in Go, that gives Linux, macOS and Windows users a full screen text user interface for browsing and managing files, aimed at developers and command line users who want more than typed shell commands.

read the full superfile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop copyparty vs dufs copyparty vs ffsend

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or superfile more popular?

copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars and superfile has 23,287. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and superfile free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and superfile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and superfile?

copyparty is written in Python and superfile in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or superfile?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,732 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose superfile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.