head to head · open source

copyparty vs Spacedrive

copyparty has 46,729 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Spacedrive has 39,006 stars, 1,352 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 20% (46,729 vs 39,006 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Spacedrive is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Spacedrive 3%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K Spacedrive ★ 39K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty Spacedrive
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 39K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-29
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick Spacedrive if

  • You want the Spacedrive feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Spacedrive fits your workflow better

full Spacedrive profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About Spacedrive

Spacedrive is an open source, cross platform file explorer built on a virtual distributed filesystem written in Rust. It unifies local and remote storage—including cloud services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and S3—into a single interface, enabling unified search, browsing, and syncing across devices without centralized servers.

read the full Spacedrive overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop copyparty vs dufs copyparty vs OpenCloud copyparty vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Spacedrive more popular?

copyparty has 46,729 GitHub stars and Spacedrive has 39,006. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and Spacedrive free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT, and Spacedrive has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between copyparty and Spacedrive?

copyparty is written in Python and Spacedrive in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or Spacedrive?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,729 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Spacedrive if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.