head to head · open source
copyparty vs cloudreve
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. cloudreve has 28,926 stars, 3,935 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 63% (47,252 vs 28,926 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cloudreve 14%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | cloudreve | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 29K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 3.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cloudreve if
- You want the cloudreve feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cloudreve fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About cloudreve
中文版本 Cloudreve Self hosted file management system with multi cloud support. Homepage • Try it • Discussion • Documents • Download • Telegram • Discord :sparkles: Features :cloud: Support storing files into Local, Remote node, OneDrive, S3 compatible API, Qiniu Kodo, Aliyun OSS, Tencent COS, Huawei Cloud OBS, Kingsoft Cloud KS3, Upyun. :outbox tray: Upload/Download in directly transmission from client to storage providers. 💾 Integrate with Aria2/qBittorrent to download files in background, use multiple download nodes to share the load. 📚 Compress/Extract/Preview archived files, download files in batch. 💻…
read the full cloudreve overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or cloudreve more popular?
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars and cloudreve has 28,926. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and cloudreve free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and cloudreve?
copyparty is written in Python and cloudreve in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or cloudreve?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,252 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cloudreve if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.