head to head · open source

LocalSend vs cloudreve

LocalSend has 92,017 GitHub stars, 5,135 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. cloudreve has 28,727 stars, 3,892 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LocalSend leads on adoption by 220% (92,017 vs 28,727 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cloudreve 14%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K cloudreve ★ 29K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend cloudreve
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 29K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 3.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick cloudreve if

  • You want the cloudreve feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cloudreve fits your workflow better

full cloudreve profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop LocalSend vs dufs LocalSend vs OpenCloud LocalSend vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or cloudreve more popular?

LocalSend has 92,017 GitHub stars and cloudreve has 28,727. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and cloudreve free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and cloudreve?

LocalSend is written in Dart and cloudreve in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or cloudreve?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,017 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cloudreve if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.