head to head · open source
copyparty vs Twake Drive
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Twake Drive has 991 stars, 166 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 4,668% (47,252 vs 991 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Twake Drive is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Twake Drive 17%. Twake Drive was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Twake Drive | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 991 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 166 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Twake Drive if
- You want the Twake Drive feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Twake Drive fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About Twake Drive
Twake Drive The open source alternative to Google Drive. Learn more » Website Issues About What's Drive? Twake Drive makes your file management easy. Main features are: File tree Files and folders upload. Files and folders sharing (via URLs) Files and folders search Getting Started :pushpin: Note: [Yarn] is the official Node package manager of Twake Drive. Don't hesitate to [install Yarn][yarn install] Install Starting the Drive app requires you to [setup a dev environment][setup]. You can then clone the app repository and install dependencies: :pushpin: Don't forget to set the local node version indicated in…
read the full Twake Drive overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Twake Drive more popular?
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars and Twake Drive has 991. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Twake Drive free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Twake Drive under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and Twake Drive?
copyparty is written in Python and Twake Drive in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Twake Drive?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,252 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Twake Drive if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.