head to head · open source
copyparty vs Sync-in
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Sync-in has 1,952 stars, 160 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,321% (47,252 vs 1,952 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Sync-in is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Sync-in 8%. Sync-in was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (file-server, file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Sync-in | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 160 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Sync-in if
- You want the Sync-in feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Sync-in fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About Sync-in
Website • Documentation • Demo • Docker setup • NPM setup • GitHub Server • GitHub Desktop & CLI Sync in is a self hosted platform for file storage, synchronization, and team collaboration. Run your own workspace for files, documents, shares, and collaborative work without giving up control of your infrastructure or data. Sync in is designed to stay fast, lightweight, and centered on your data, keeping files readable on your filesystem while adding collaboration features only where they are needed. Features 🖥️ Modern web interface with drag and drop, smart clipboard, gallery view, sorting, filtering, and…
read the full Sync-in overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Sync-in more popular?
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars and Sync-in has 1,952. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Sync-in free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Sync-in under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and Sync-in?
copyparty is written in Python and Sync-in in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Sync-in?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,252 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Sync-in if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.