head to head · open source

copyparty vs safebucket

copyparty has 46,907 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. safebucket has 964 stars, 41 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 4,766% (46,907 vs 964 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; safebucket is written in Go under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, safebucket 4%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K safebucket ★ 964 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty safebucket
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 964
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-10-03 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 41
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick safebucket if

  • You want the safebucket feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and safebucket fits your workflow better

full safebucket profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About safebucket

Safebucket is an open source, self hosted file sharing platform written in Go for teams that want to keep file storage and access on their own infrastructure rather than with a cloud provider.

read the full safebucket overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or safebucket more popular?

copyparty has 46,907 GitHub stars and safebucket has 964. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and safebucket free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and safebucket under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and safebucket?

copyparty is written in Python and safebucket in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or safebucket?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,907 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose safebucket if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.