head to head · open source
copyparty vs rclone-manager
copyparty has 47,277 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. rclone-manager has 1,217 stars, 61 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 3,785% (47,277 vs 1,217 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; rclone-manager is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, rclone-manager 5%. rclone-manager was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | rclone-manager | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 61 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick rclone-manager if
- You want the rclone-manager feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and rclone-manager fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About rclone-manager
RClone Manager 🇺🇸 English • 🇹🇷 Türkçe • 🇨🇳 简体中文 • 🇹🇼 繁體中文 • 🇫🇷 Français • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇧🇷 Português Brasil • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇯🇵 日本語 • Help to translate • Crowdin A powerful, cross platform GUI for managing Rclone remotes with style and ease. Built with Angular 22 + Tauri · Linux • Windows • macOS • Android (Beta) • ARM Support Overview RClone Manager simplifies remote file management and synchronization. Using Rclone as its backbone, it offers a desktop environment with a built in file manager ( Nautilus ) to transfer, mount, and serve remote files effortlessly. 📂 Nautilus File Manager: Browse…
read the full rclone-manager overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or rclone-manager more popular?
copyparty has 47,277 GitHub stars and rclone-manager has 1,217. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and rclone-manager free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and rclone-manager under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and rclone-manager?
copyparty is written in Python and rclone-manager in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or rclone-manager?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,277 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rclone-manager if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.