head to head · open source
copyparty vs r2-web
copyparty has 47,289 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. r2-web has 500 stars, 103 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 9,358% (47,289 vs 500 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; r2-web is written in JavaScript under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, r2-web 21%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | r2-web | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 500 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 103 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick r2-web if
- You want the r2-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and r2-web fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About r2-web
中文 English R2 Web 📁 轻盈优雅的 Web 原生 Cloudflare R2 文件管理器，一切皆在浏览器中完成。 本项目曾被 [《科技爱好者周刊（第 387 期）》][ruanyifeng weekly] 和 [《HelloGitHub（第 123 期）》][hellogithub 123] 推荐。 在线使用 按 快速开始 配置 R2 CORS，然后访问 r2.viki.moe 。凭证只保存在浏览器本地。 为什么做 R2 Web？ Cloudflare 控制台适合基础操作，但大量文件的浏览、移动、重命名和临时上传并不高效；桌面客户端需要安装，CLI 又不适合所有人。R2 Web 希望补上一个随开随用、跨平台且专注 R2 的管理界面。 差异化优势 R2 Web 不替代复杂权限管理、自动化脚本或 API 集成；这些场景建议使用 Cloudflare 控制台、官方 SDK、CLI 或 rclone。 功能速览 界面截图 快速开始 1. 配置 R2 桶 CORS 在 Cloudflare 控制台进入 R2 → 存储桶 → 设置 → CORS 策略 ： 私有部署时，将 AllowedOrigins 替换为自己的域名。 ETag 是完成分片上传所必需的响应头。 2. 创建并填写凭证 创建权限限定到目标 bucket 的 R2 API Token，在 r2.viki.moe 填写 Account ID、Access…
read the full r2-web overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or r2-web more popular?
copyparty has 47,289 GitHub stars and r2-web has 500. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and r2-web free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and r2-web under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and r2-web?
copyparty is written in Python and r2-web in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or r2-web?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,289 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose r2-web if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.